All the joy there is in life

He talked and talked – I said something, but he did not know that I had. He talked – I found myself absent-minded, then with my attention half on what he said, realized I was listening for the world I in what he said. I, I, I, I, I – I began to feel as if the word I was being shot at me like bullets from a machine gun. For a moment I fancied that his mouth, moving fast and mobile was a gun of some kind. I broke in, he didn’t hear, I broke in again, saying: “You’re very well-educated about children, have you been married?” He started, his mouth was slightly open, he stared. Then the loud, abrupt laugh: “Married, who are you kidding?” It offended me, it was so clearly a warning to me. This man, warning me, a woman, about marriage, was quite a different person from the man compulsively talking, compulsively spinning out intelligent words (but punctuated every second by the word I) about how to bring up a small girl to be a “real woman”, and quite different again from the man who had undressed me with his eyes on the first day. I felt my stomach clench, and for the time I understood that my anxiety state was due to Saul Green. I pushed aside my empty coffee cup, and said it was time for my bath. I’d forgotten how he reacts, as if he’s been hit or kicked, when one says one has something else to do. For he again scrambled off his chair as if he had been ordered. This time I said: “Saul, for the Lord’s sake, relax.” An instinctive movement towards flight, which he controlled. The moment of his self-control was a visible physical struggle with himself in which all his muscles were involved. Then he gave me a charming shrewd smile and said: “You’re right, I guess I’m not the most relaxed person in the world.” (…) Lay in the bath, clenched up with every sort of apprehension, but watching the symptoms of an “anxiety state” with detachment. It was as if a stranger, afflicted with symptoms I had never experienced had taken possession of my body. Then I tidied the place up and sat on the floor in my room, and tried “the game”. I failed. It then occurred to me I was going to fall in love with Saul Green. I remember now I first ridiculed the idea, then examined it, then accepted it: more than accepted it – I fought for it, as for something that was my due.


(…) This evening, sitting opposite to me, he said: “I have a friend back home. Just before I left to come to Europe he said to me that he was tired of affairs, of getting laid. It gets very dry and meaningless.” I laughed and said: “Since your friend is so well-read, he must know this is a common condition, after too many affairs.” He said, quickly: “How do you know he is well-read?” The familiar jarring moment: first because it was so obvious he was talking about himself, and at first I thought he was being ironical. Then, because he jerked into himself, all suspicion and caution, as over the incident with the telephone. But worst of all because he didn’t say: “How did you know I was well-read?” but “he was well-read”, and yet it was clearly himself. He even, after the quick warning stare at me, looked away as if staring at someone else, at him.

(…) Later he came back to the “friend”. Just as if he had not mentioned him before. I had the feeling he had forgotten talking about him, only half an hour before. I said: “This friend of yours” – (and again he looked into the centre of the room, away from us both, at the friend) – “does he intend to give up getting laid, or is it just another little impulse towards self-experiment?”
I had heard the emphasis I had put on the words getting laid, and I realized why I was sounding irritable. I said: “Whenever you talk about sex or love you say: he got laid or they got laid (male).” He gave his abrupt laugh, but not comprehending, so I said: “Always the passive.” He said, quickly: “What do you mean?”
“It gives me the most extraordinary uneasy feeling, listening to you – surely I get laid, she gets laid, they (female) get laid, but surely you as a man don’t get laid, you lay.”
He said slowly: “Lady, you surely know how to make me feel a hick.” But it was the parody of a crude American saying: You surely know how to make me feel a hick.
His eyes gleamed with hostility. And I was full of hostility. Something I’ve been feeling for days boiled up. I said: “The other day (…) you described yourself as the original puritan, Saul Galahad to the defense, but you talk about getting laid, you never said a woman, you say a broad, a lay, a baby, a doll, a bird, you talk about butts and boobs, every time you mention a woman I see her either as a sort of a window-dresser’s dummy or as a heap of dismembered parts, breasts, or legs or buttocks.”
(…) “I supposed this is what you call being a square, but I’m damned if I see how a man can have a healthy attitude to sex if he can’t talk about anything but butts and babies being stacked or packed and so on and so on. No wonder the bloody Americans are all in trouble with their bloody sex lives”.
After a while he said, very dry: “It’s the first time in my life I’ve been accused of being anti-feminist. It’d interest you to know that I’m the only American male I know who doesn’t accuse American women of all the sexual sins in the calendar, do you imagine I don’t know that men blame women for their inadequacies?”

Well, and of course that softened me, stopped my anger. We talked about politics. For on this subject we don’t disagree.
(…) I was able for the first time to joke with him, so that his laugh wasn’t defensive. He wears his new blue jeans, new blue sweater, sneakers. I told him he should be ashamed to wear the uniform of American non-conformist; he said he wasn’t adult enough yet to join the tiny minority of human beings who didn’t need a uniform.

I am hopelessly in love with this man. Continue reading


Mimosa (International Women’s Day)

24 February 2016, Punjab – Pakistan

A flame flickered briefly at the end of February, giving hope to the thousands of women subjected to domestic violence who currently have nowhere to turn.
The Protection of Women Against Violence Bill passed the Punjab provincial legislature unanimously on February 24, after about nine months of opposition.
The legislation criminalizes domestic, emotional, psychological, verbal and economic abuse, as well as stalking and cybercrime.
It would establish a 24-hour domestic abuse hotline, a network of shelters or safe houses where women could take refuge and receive basic medical aid and counseling for physical and mental abuse. The law effectively mandates intervention by local authorities on behalf of abuse victims — and penalties for offenders.

CBS News, March 7th 2016

Some have claimed the Bill could be a game changer…

Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology, a committee comprised of Islamic scholars that regularly advises the government on the compliance of laws with Islamic values, has declared the Women’s Protection Act un-Islamic.
In a press conference last Thursday, council chairman Muhammad Khan Sherani demanded the bill be handed over for a formal review.
“It is unacceptable,” he said. “The law seems to have the objective of pushing women out of the home and to increase their problems.”
Others who have joined the fight to block the bill complain that it violates men’s rights and dignity. Some have labelled it a secular move driven by a western conspiracy.”

CBS News, March 7th 2016

Today’s the International Women’s Day. Which is not about nice pictures, hot male-strippers’ dances, women going out with their girl-friends to get drunk (and laid).
Or it shouldn’t be.
At least, just because in most countries of the world, women can’t do that. As many other, fundamental things. Including leaving their home if their husband abuses them, or denounce a rape.

Happy International Women’s day, then.
To us, who can celebrate it. And to those who can’t (and may never can).


Boom! e contraddizioni

Le contraddizioni sono una cosa interessante. Perché inaspettate. Come il caso. Lo stesso di cui parla Kundera trattando dell’essere e della sua insostenibile leggerezza.
Le contraddizioni, dicevo, sono interessanti in quanto inaspettate. Credi che l’evento A arrivi e invece, Boom!, ecco non-A, il suo contrario ed opposto, nient’affatto concorde.
(Bello poi come proprio in tale contrasto qualcuno secoli fa riuscì a vedere un’armonia essenziale).
Non-A arriva (ché non è certo B l’opposto, quello semmai è il conseguente, o un’altra cosa semplicemente) come un cazzotto nell’occhio o un pugno nello stomaco.
Ti aspetti, ad esempio, che A. sia sicura e straightforward come appare, e poi ti spara in faccia paure che ricordano le tue tardo-adolescenziali (e vorresti tanto dirle, ad A., che anche tu pensavi proprio lo stesso, cosi così come fa lei, e anche tu come lei avevi tanta paura che ti si togliesse di dosso, da sotto i piedi, la terra che tanto faticosamente hai racimolato e compattato, e quindi no, non si deve preoccupare, che a lei non lo faresti mai, anzi col terreno sotto i piedi la faresti solo volare come Aladino la sua principessa usando il tappeto fatato).
Ti aspetti, continuando con la lista, che l’avocado, in quanto frutto, sia dolce e succoso. Invece è d’una pasta molle ed allapposa che è fatto (si dice “allapposa” in italiano? Il correttore di word dice di no, ma chissà, ecco, magari ha senso uguale). Sta bene con pomodori ciliegia e feta sbriciolata, magari anche con una punta di pepe e un tocco di scorza di limone grattata.
Anche il limone non è dolce, eppure sempre frutto è. Le arance sono della stessa famiglia dei limoni, ma quando son tarocche o fortemente sanguinelle, allora ad ogni spicchio il dolce si sprigiona in bocca e arriva, sparato, fino al cuore.
Lista di contraddizioni, ancora.
C. è alta ed intelligente ed assertiva, porta i capelli rosso pel-di-carota ora – in passato erano aragosta addirittura. Prima ancora, dice, ha provato mille altri colori, dal nero corvino al fucsia al, forse, pure arancione. O corti cortissimi, ossigenati al punto da diventare bianchi, pare.

love Continue reading


How does it make you feel? Awkward? Embarrassed? Like you’d want to run from the room screaming if someone started talking about their monthly bleed? Now imagine how you’d be feeling if men had periods instead of women. We think it would be pretty different – in six significant ways. 1. The monthly bleed would be a sign of manliness 2. Coming on would be celebrated 3. Periods would be called… periods! 4. Sportsmen would take their periods seriously – very seriously 5. Sanitary items would be a human right 6. Tampon adverts would be turbo-charged

WaterAid – If men had periods

1.25 BILLION WOMEN do NOT have access to a toilet during their period. What if it wasn’t so?